Please read the digital images integrity and standards section of our editorial policies. The page is updated on an annual basis. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Journals can customize the wording of status terms.
If the data do not meet the assumptions of the test, then a non-parametric alternative should be used instead. by. "Someone with great intrinsic skills can be put in charge of anything and they will figure it out," he shares. Normal distribution: Many statistical tests require that the data be approximately normally distributed; when using these tests, authors should explain how they tested their data for normality. npj Digital Medicine 2398-6352 (Online) Website ISSN Portal About; Articles; About. Only after clearing the initial screening is the manuscript sent to one or more peer reviewers. Thank you for your feedback, it will help us serve you better. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. The corresponding author should be familiar with the journals Editorial policies and is solely responsible for communicating with the journal and managing communication between coauthors. [CDATA[> Use one name throughout and include any others at first mention: 'Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1)'. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. Data sets should be summarized with descriptive statistics, which should include the n value for each data set, a clearly labeled measure of centre (such as the mean or the median), and a clearly labeled measure of variability (such as standard deviation or range). HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. This usually happens if there are a lot of papers for which the reviews have already come in before yours. I was in bed when I heard a empathic knock at the front door that resonated throughout the dwelling. A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. Answer: When the status for a manuscript changes "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision", it means that the peer-review process is complete and only the editorial decision is pending. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. In such a case withdraw the manuscript and sent it some where else. Chem, 2016, 1 (1), 147-153. Manuscripts published in the npj Series journals are not subject to in-depth copy editing or display item redrawing as part of the production process. Each figure legend should be presented on the same page as its figure. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? For full book submissions, editors are now moving into the peer review phase, which takes time, time, and more time. We can accept LaTeX files at the acceptance stage, but before then please supply compiled PDFs. Internet Explorer). on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. When can I expect a decision from the Editor? Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be held to rigorous standards with respect to experimental methods and characterization of compounds. The homogeneity and purity of solid state compounds may be characterized by solid state NMR, powder X-ray diffraction data and where possible compared to calculated diffraction patterns. Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? Input parameters, basis sets and coordinates of the input and output structures must be reported. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqus avec *. The form can also be requested by the authors from the NPJ managing editor at this e-mail address: npjeditor@frontiernet.net. All display items should be on a white background, and should avoid excessive boxing, unnecessary colour, spurious decorative effects (such as three-dimensional 'skyscraper' histograms) and highly pixelated computer drawings. Yes, the season of waiting is difficult. If your manuscript is sent to reviewers, please share with the community how many days the evaluated process took by editor's office (not include the evaluated process of reviewers). However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Based on the npj Quantum Information Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 70.0 days to get the first editorial decision. Book titles should be given in italics and all words in the title should have initial capitals. by | Jun 21, 2022 | what is the most accurate latin translator | burlington iowa arrests | Jun 21, 2022 | what is the most accurate latin translator | burlington iowa arrests A copy of the checklist can also be downloaded on our policies page. Graphs should include clearly labeled error bars. Recoloring primary data, such as fluorescence images, to color-safe combinations such as green and magenta or other accessible color palettes is strongly encouraged. npj Breast Cancer | Acceptance Rate. I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). or a standard deviation (s.d.). Author Approved Converted Files 2019-01-12 00:26:21. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. At the initial submission stage authors should incorporate figures into the main article file, ensuring that any inserted figures are of sufficient quality to be clearly legible. Answered by Editage Insights The reporting summary will be published with all accepted manuscripts.